The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has officially addressed AI's role in filmmaking, announcing that generative artificial intelligence tools "neither help nor harm" a film's chances at Oscar gold. This practical stance comes as AI tools gain traction across Hollywood productions and establishes clear guidelines for how the prestigious awards body will evaluate AI-assisted creative work moving forward.

AI Gets Its Close-Up: Academy emphasizes human creativity remains the star of the show

The new language, recommended by the Academy's Science and Technology Council, takes a measured approach to AI while keeping humans in the director's chair.

"With regard to Generative Artificial Intelligence and other digital tools used in the making of the film, the tools neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination. The Academy and each branch will judge the achievement, taking into account the degree to which a human was at the heart of the creative authorship when choosing which movie to award," the official rules now state.

This balanced approach acknowledges several realities about AI in production:

• The technology has already been integrated into award-winning films, including The Brutalist, which used AI to enhance Hungarian accents and won three Oscars including Best Actor for Adrien Brody

• Other recent nominees like Dune: Part Two, Emilia Pérez, and A Complete Unknown also utilized AI tools in their production processes

• The Academy initially considered requiring disclosure of AI use during submissions but ultimately opted for a more flexible approach

• Avatar director James Cameron has embraced AI as "the next wave" in cinematic innovation, calling it a natural evolution from CGI

Wait, They Weren't Watching?: Academy finally requires members to actually see the films they vote on

In a move that seems about 98 years overdue, the Academy will now require members to watch all nominated films in a category before voting in the final round.

Yes, you read that correctly – apparently until now, Academy members could vote for films they hadn't actually seen. Talk about judging a book by its cover... or perhaps a movie by its poster.

The Academy will enforce this revolutionary "watch before you vote" concept through its exclusive Screening Room platform, which automatically tracks viewing activity. For films seen elsewhere—at festivals, theaters, or private screenings—members must submit a form confirming when and where they watched them.

This change aims to eliminate "coattail voting," where members might vote based on reputation or buzz rather than, you know, actually watching the movies:

• The requirement applies to all 24 competitive Oscar categories

• Viewing will be tracked through the Academy Screening Room platform and self-reported forms

• The system builds on existing processes used for categories like international feature and animated shorts

• The enforcement mechanism remains somewhat vague, as voters will simply need to affirm they've seen each nominated film – leaving room for what might charitably be called "creative recollections"

Final Cut: How these changes reshape Hollywood's relationship with technology

The Academy's AI stance represents a pragmatic recognition of how filmmaking is evolving in the digital age. Rather than drawing hard lines against emerging technologies, the rules focus on the human creative element that has always been central to cinematic storytelling.

This balanced approach acknowledges both the inevitability of technological advancement and the irreplaceable value of human artistry:

• The rules provide clarity for filmmakers exploring AI while emphasizing that human creativity remains the primary consideration

• The policy reflects broader industry conversations about AI, following intense contract negotiations by writers' and actors' unions focused on AI safeguards

• By focusing on the "degree to which a human was at the heart of creative authorship," the Academy maintains artistic integrity while allowing for technological innovation

• The decision signals that the Oscars will continue to evolve alongside the industry they celebrate, embracing new tools while honoring the human creativity that drives storytelling

As one visual effects veteran told Variety: "It's never been possible to get a great digital performance that wasn't based on a human actor... any person in any craft will say it's collaboration. That's always going to be the case."